Scientists have found that the virus was created to adapt well to humans

Scientists have found that the virus was created to adapt well to humans

Using Oracle supercomputing, scientists at Flinders University calculated that the SARS-CoV-2 virus did not originate in bats, but was likely engineered to invade human ACE-2 host cells.

“We were trying to find what kind of lock was best designed to open the Covid-19 key. You can try to fit the shape of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein structure into all the ACE2 structures of different animals to see which one fits the best, as if you were trying to solve a puzzle, ”explained Dr. Nikolai Petrovsky, a professor at Flinders University and Vaxine’s director of research, in a recently published study.

Petrovsky and his team used the “in silico modeling” method of the Oracle supercomputer to identify the initial host of COVID-19. The researchers analyzed various ACE2 receptors, parts of cells that allow coronaviruses to enter or protect them, and compared them to spike proteins. The tips on the outside of the virus seem to fit like a key into the ACE2 locks of the cells.

The origins of SARS-CoV-2
The results were quite surprising, as it turns out that the spike proteins were ‘engineered’ to fit human ACE2 receptors, which also means that the virus must have originated, at least for the most part, in humans, not animals. and maybe in a lab.

This severely undermines the currently held theory, especially among Chinese scientists, that the virus came from a bat spread event and somehow landed in someone’s soup in a wet market in Wuhan, China.

As Sharri Markson detailed in her 2021 book What Really Happened In Wuhan, Petrovsky and her team analyzed and simulated a variety of ACE2 gene sequences from bats, civets, and rats:

Very quickly, he (Petrovsky) got a result, and it was a result that caused him a lot of distress. “Interestingly, humans topped the list,” Petrovsky said.

“That was not what we expected, as the animal host from which the virus was transmitted should have been at the top of the list. This presented an enigma, as the data suggested that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein had uniquely evolved to bind and infect cells expressing human ACE2. Normally, with a new pandemic virus, whatever species the virus originally came from would be the best option, and the virus would initially only adjust to half the human lock, but then mutate over time to try and adapt better. A virus should not be able to evolve to perfectly fit a lock that it has never seen, and yet this is what the data was telling us. The virus spike protein looked like it couldn’t have been better engineered to match human ACE2. Go figure”.

The Nature Scientific report
Petrovsky and his team published their results in June 2021 in the highly respected journal Nature Scientific Reports, in a report entitled “In silico Comparison of Peak-ACE2 Protein Binding Affinities Between Species; importance for the possible origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus ″.

“In particular, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein had the highest total binding energy for human ACE2, higher than all other species tested, including the bat, the postulated source of the virus,” the study read. . “This indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is a highly adapted human pathogen,” he said.

“This finding is particularly surprising since, typically, a virus would be expected to have the highest affinity for the receptor in its original host species, eg bat, with a lower initial binding affinity for the receptor of any new host, for example, humans, ”the researchers wrote.

The current findings are in stark contrast to the conventional theory that the virus is of animal origin.


Follow us in: Telegram